And, once again, we tried to push it to the limit and see what it could handle. ![]() ![]() Using External Displayīefore this, we received many questions about how the MacBook Air would perform with an external display attached to it. With this result, both versions of the M1 MacBook Air seem to be a good fit for anyone who plans to use their Mac for video or photo editing. And, the results on both models were very similar with around 30 minutes for rendering and 15 minutes for exporting a 25 minutes 5.4 K DJI Mavic Air 2s Drone Footage. With the powerful M1 chip, our MacBook Air can easily run through 4K editing using Final Cut Pro X. When we closed more tabs, both devices went back to their normal state with everything running very smoothly. Surprisingly, it did take more load to slow down the base 8GB model than we expected. The familiar rainbow spinning wheel of death finally appeared when we opened more than 20 Safari tabs, 6 Safari windows (each playing videos at 2160p), and Spotify in the background. However, the condition on both MacBooks stayed the same. Then, we added 2 x86 apps, which were emulated with Rosetta 2. So, 12 apps were opened at once here, but there was still no sign of slowing down in both models. In our first overload test, we tried to push the Mac to its limit to find out at what point the M1 MacBook Air would slow down. However, when it comes to multitasking, that is where 16GB RAM really shines. Let’s move on to the next one! Overload TestsĪs you’ve seen in the Geekbench scores, the RAM advantage doesn’t make a difference in the actual raw processing power of the 16GB M1 MacBook Air. So, despite the RAM difference, the results on both devices are basically the same here.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |